Skip to main content

Incentives for first drafts

I mentioned last week that I will be having students in my upper-division writing class working together as 'co-authors'. But I'm still trying to figure out how to distribute points for each assignment. I want students to take their first drafts seriously so I feel like some part of their grade should depend on that first draft. On the other hand, I don't really want to grade the first draft the same way I would the final draft (mostly a time thing - I simply don't have the time to grade thirty papers in 48 hours with the care I would want), and I want students to take their revisions seriously as well. I've considered not assigning grades to the first draft at all and simply taking points off the assignment as a whole if they don't do a first draft, but I worry that then they won't take the first draft very seriously. Maybe that's OK, since they will have to do a revision anyway and the first draft at least makes them put their thoughts down, but since those first drafts will be reviewed by a classmates, I'd prefer that they be as good as the students can make them at that point. I've also considered making the first draft some small percentage of their assignment grade, like 10 or 20 percent, but then I feel like I'll actually need to grade the first draft. And I've considered basing part of their grade on the improvement between their first and final drafts but that seems like it could create a weird incentive for them to purposely write crappy first drafts.

Maybe there is no way to really incentivize strong effort on the first draft if I'm not willing to put the time into grading those drafts, but if anyone has any ideas, I'd love to hear them!
Labels:

Comments

  1. Angela DillsJanuary 21, 2010 at 6:36 AM

    Since it sounds like there are some basic components to the first draft (collecting data, making a graphic, and writing a couple of paragraphs), the grading on the first draft could be fairly perfunctory. Did they actually do all three of these things or not? Quick to observe, allowing you to turn them over quickly and ensure that everyone did a basic draft that can be peer reviewed. Since the next step is peer revision, the thought that one of their classmates will read their paper tends to be sufficient motivation to write something good enough to not be embarrassed by it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jennifer ImazekiJanuary 26, 2010 at 8:30 PM

    Thanks Angela! I think you're right about the embarrassment incentive. Ironically, last year, I remember one student saying that he didn't turn in his first draft at all because he knew it wasn't very good and he didn't want his classmate to see it (which is one reason why I feel like I can't rely on that alone!).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Comments that contribute to the discussion are always welcome! Please note that spammy comments whose only purpose seems to be to direct traffic to a commercial site will be deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

Economics Education sessions at ASSA

If I missed any, please let me know... Jan 07, 2011 8:00 am , Sheraton, Director's Row H American Economic Association K-12 Economic and Financial Literacy Education (A2) Presiding: Richard MacDonald (St. Cloud State University) Teacher and Student Characteristics as Determinants of Success in High School Economics Classes Jody Hoff  (Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco) Jane Lopus (California State University-East Bay) Rob Valletta (Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco) [Download Preview] It Takes a Village: Determinants of the Efficacy of Financial Literacy Education for Elementary and Middle School Students Weiwei Chen (University of Memphis) Julie Heath (University of Memphis) Economics Understanding of Albanian High School Students: Student and Teacher Effects and Specific Concept Knowledge Dolore Bushati (University of Kansas) Barbara Phipps (University of Kansas) Lecture and Tutorial Attendance and Student Performance in t...
5 comments
Read more

This is about getting through, not re-inventing your course

As someone who has worked hard to build a lot of interactivity into my courses, I have never been interested in teaching fully online courses, in part because I have felt that the level of engaged interaction could never match that of a face-to-face class (not that there aren't some exceptional online courses out there; I just have a strong preference for the in-person connection). But the current situation is not really about building online courses that are 'just as good' as our face-to-face courses; it is about getting through this particular moment without compromising our students' learning too much. So if you are used to a lot of interaction in your F2F class, here are some options for adapting that interaction for a virtual environment: [NOTE: SDSU is a Zoom/mostly Blackboard campus so that's how I've written this but I am pretty sure that other systems have similar functionality] If you use clickers in class to break up what is otherwise mostly lect...
2 comments
Read more

Moving on...

I want to let everyone know that I am officially closing out this chapter of my blogging life. It was 17 years ago this May that I started this blog, back when blogging was still relatively new, and I was exploring ways to have my students do some writing. During the years from 2008 to 2015-ish, when I was most active with experimenting with different pedagogical approaches, this space helped me process what I was learning, and connected me with economists and other colleagues who care about teaching. As I have moved into other roles, I have been torn about what to do with this space, feeling a bit weird about posting anything not directly related to teaching. I have finally decided I need to start fresh so I will be writing (though I have no idea how regularly) on Substack .  Thank you to everyone who has read and commented over the years. I hope you'll find me on Substack, or in real life!
Post a Comment
Read more