Skip to main content

Discussing the financial crisis

I must be a masochist. I woke up yesterday morning and decided that I just couldn't NOT talk about the financial crisis in my classes. But since my own understanding of the crisis was pretty shallow, I proceeded to spend the next five hours reading everything I could find, bugging my colleagues and putting together a lecture for my Principles class at noon that tried to tie the crisis together with our recent discussions of cost-benefit analysis and incentives (if anyone is interested, the lecture is now on my iTunesU site - email me directly and I'm happy to send the link). I jumped forward in my syllabus and talked about moral hazard but I think it actually fit quite well with our previous discussions so I may even keep it there in the future. Of course, I have no idea what my students thought of my presentation but I'm glad I did it; this whole situation clearly has huge implications and even if most of my students aren't directly affected right now, they need to be aware of what's going on.

This morning, the Freakonomics blog has a post from Chicago economists Doug Diamond and Anil Kashyap that explains it all way better than I could (though they do assume a certain level of familiarity with financial markets that I'm not sure all my students have). And I could never share this with my students in class but this powerpoint show gives a hysterical, and fairly accurate, explanation too.
Labels:

Comments

  1. Don CoffinSeptember 23, 2008 at 5:40 AM

    I'm about to do the same thing. (I have a little flexibility, because my campus is closed by flooding until next Monday, making a total of 2 weeks...having a campus in a flood plain in what sed to be a marsh--northwest Indiana--has its drawbacks.) So I'd love to see/hear what you did.
    Don

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Comments that contribute to the discussion are always welcome! Please note that spammy comments whose only purpose seems to be to direct traffic to a commercial site will be deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

THE podcast on Implicit Bias

I keep telling myself I need to get back to blogging but, well, it's been a long pandemic... But I guess this is as good an excuse as any to post something: I am Bonni Stachowiak's guest on the latest episode of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast, talking about implicit bias and how it can impact our teaching.  Doing the interview with Bonni (which was actually recorded a couple months ago) was a lot of fun. Listening to it now, I also realize how far I have come from the instructor I was when I started this blog over a decade ago. I've been away from the blog so long that I should probably spell this out: my current title is Associate Vice President for Faculty and Staff Diversity and I have responsibility for all professional learning and development related to diversity, equity and inclusion, as well as inclusive faculty and staff recruitment, and unit-level diversity planning. But I often say that in a lot of ways, I have no business being in this position - I've ne...
Post a Comment
Read more

When is an exam "too hard"?

By now, you may have heard about the biology professor at Louisiana State (Baton Rouge) who was removed from teaching an intro course where "more than 90 percent of the students... were failing or had dropped the class." The majority of the comments on the Inside Higher Ed story about it are supportive of the professor, particularly given that it seems like the administration did not even talk to her about the situation before acting. I tend to fall in the "there's got to be more to the story so I'll reserve judgment" camp but the story definitely struck a nerve with me, partly because I recently spent 30 minutes "debating" with a student about whether the last midterm was "too hard" and the whole conversation was super-frustrating. To give some background: I give three midterms and a cumulative final, plus have clicker points and Aplia assignments that make up about 20% of the final grade. I do not curve individual exams but will cu...
3 comments
Read more

This is about getting through, not re-inventing your course

As someone who has worked hard to build a lot of interactivity into my courses, I have never been interested in teaching fully online courses, in part because I have felt that the level of engaged interaction could never match that of a face-to-face class (not that there aren't some exceptional online courses out there; I just have a strong preference for the in-person connection). But the current situation is not really about building online courses that are 'just as good' as our face-to-face courses; it is about getting through this particular moment without compromising our students' learning too much. So if you are used to a lot of interaction in your F2F class, here are some options for adapting that interaction for a virtual environment: [NOTE: SDSU is a Zoom/mostly Blackboard campus so that's how I've written this but I am pretty sure that other systems have similar functionality] If you use clickers in class to break up what is otherwise mostly lect...
2 comments
Read more