Skip to main content

Glutton for punishment

OK, someone really needs to save me from myself... Just to make life more interesting, I've decided that it would be cool to teach this new data course using team-based learning (TBL). For those not familiar with TBL, the basic idea is that students are organized into 5-7 person teams that stay together through the entire semester and then as much of the course as possible is built around team activities. So now, on top of trying to figure out the basic content and topics for a course I've never taught before, I'm also trying to figure out how to structure assignments and assessments using a method I've never used before.* Fun!

Actually, it's not quite as crazy as it sort of seems (at least, that's what I keep telling myself) - designing a team-based learning course basically requires backward design, which I was doing anyway, and in a TBL course, the instructor doesn't really do traditional lectures, which I really don't want to do. Instead, students acquire a lot of the basic content knowledge outside of class and then classes are built around simple assessments of that basic knowledge (to make sure students are really prepared), followed by application exercises. Since this is a course where the students are supposed to have already acquired much of the basic knowledge previously anyway (i.e., a lower-division stats class is a prerequisite), and the point is for students to get experience using that knowledge in the ways that economists do, I think the TBL structure actually is a good fit. Instead of me talking, students will spend almost all of the class time doing. Plus, the teams will mean I can give more complex assignments without a corresponding increase in time spent grading (one section will have 70 students and the other will have 60 - yes, I know that's totally nuts). I've still got a ton of things to figure out, and I have serious concerns about how this is going to go over with the students, but as I have been thinking about the types of activities I want students to do and how these will work in groups, I have to say that I'm pretty excited!

* I blame Bill Goffe for this - he mentioned TBL to me in an email a few months ago and then recently posted this link on the tch-econ listserv, showing TBL in action in a large lecture. If you're not familiar with the technique, I highly recommend checking out the video and the website.

Comments

  1. How very exciting! I have just discovered Team-Based Learning (TBL) myself in the past year and I think there is something to it.

    I tried using TBL for an intro-level environmental economics and policy course this past year and I liked many aspects of it. Beware, some students think that the professor "isn't teaching" in TBL courses because they are so used to being lectured at, but I think it really creates a great learning environment.

    The assignments seem to be of the highest import: good assignments will require teams to work together as a team and not just let one motivated student do it by herself. This can be a real challenge for a class like your data analysis course, as we are used to doing data analysis alone and not necessarily in teams of five.

    One of my favorite parts of TBL is that the assignments tend to ask teams to simultaneously report their specific answers to the same question. Teams cannot hide behind whatever answers are already offered, as everyone has to answer at the same time. Class discussion naturally follows when teams have different answers.

    I want to try teaching my Principles of Micro course this fall using TBL. I look forward to following along with your TBL adventures!

    ReplyDelete
  2. TBL is a great approach and it sounds like it's particularly appropriate for this course. It also works well with clickers--one per student for individual quizzes, one per team for group quizzes!

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Aaron: Thanks for the encouragement! I do think that my principles students would be incredibly resistant to TBL (though that video about the large class gives me hope). With the upper-division class, I'm a little less worried because I think it will be easier to convince students that this is not a course where I should be talking at them anyway - they need to DO stuff. If it goes well, I may try TBL with Principles at some point so let me know how your class goes!
    @Derek: Yes, definitely going to use clickers! Since the TBL approach really emphasizes that in the application exercises, students should make a *specific* choice, I'm thinking that in addition the quizzes, it will be cool to use clickers to have students register their own opinion about the 'right' choice before beginning discussion with their groups. Should be interesting to see how those opinions change specifically after the group discussions!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Comments that contribute to the discussion are always welcome! Please note that spammy comments whose only purpose seems to be to direct traffic to a commercial site will be deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

Economics Education sessions at ASSA

If I missed any, please let me know... Jan 07, 2011 8:00 am , Sheraton, Director's Row H American Economic Association K-12 Economic and Financial Literacy Education (A2) Presiding: Richard MacDonald (St. Cloud State University) Teacher and Student Characteristics as Determinants of Success in High School Economics Classes Jody Hoff  (Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco) Jane Lopus (California State University-East Bay) Rob Valletta (Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco) [Download Preview] It Takes a Village: Determinants of the Efficacy of Financial Literacy Education for Elementary and Middle School Students Weiwei Chen (University of Memphis) Julie Heath (University of Memphis) Economics Understanding of Albanian High School Students: Student and Teacher Effects and Specific Concept Knowledge Dolore Bushati (University of Kansas) Barbara Phipps (University of Kansas) Lecture and Tutorial Attendance and Student Performance in t...

This is about getting through, not re-inventing your course

As someone who has worked hard to build a lot of interactivity into my courses, I have never been interested in teaching fully online courses, in part because I have felt that the level of engaged interaction could never match that of a face-to-face class (not that there aren't some exceptional online courses out there; I just have a strong preference for the in-person connection). But the current situation is not really about building online courses that are 'just as good' as our face-to-face courses; it is about getting through this particular moment without compromising our students' learning too much. So if you are used to a lot of interaction in your F2F class, here are some options for adapting that interaction for a virtual environment: [NOTE: SDSU is a Zoom/mostly Blackboard campus so that's how I've written this but I am pretty sure that other systems have similar functionality] If you use clickers in class to break up what is otherwise mostly lect...

Moving on...

I want to let everyone know that I am officially closing out this chapter of my blogging life. It was 17 years ago this May that I started this blog, back when blogging was still relatively new, and I was exploring ways to have my students do some writing. During the years from 2008 to 2015-ish, when I was most active with experimenting with different pedagogical approaches, this space helped me process what I was learning, and connected me with economists and other colleagues who care about teaching. As I have moved into other roles, I have been torn about what to do with this space, feeling a bit weird about posting anything not directly related to teaching. I have finally decided I need to start fresh so I will be writing (though I have no idea how regularly) on Substack .  Thank you to everyone who has read and commented over the years. I hope you'll find me on Substack, or in real life!