Skip to main content

Glutton for punishment

OK, someone really needs to save me from myself... Just to make life more interesting, I've decided that it would be cool to teach this new data course using team-based learning (TBL). For those not familiar with TBL, the basic idea is that students are organized into 5-7 person teams that stay together through the entire semester and then as much of the course as possible is built around team activities. So now, on top of trying to figure out the basic content and topics for a course I've never taught before, I'm also trying to figure out how to structure assignments and assessments using a method I've never used before.* Fun!

Actually, it's not quite as crazy as it sort of seems (at least, that's what I keep telling myself) - designing a team-based learning course basically requires backward design, which I was doing anyway, and in a TBL course, the instructor doesn't really do traditional lectures, which I really don't want to do. Instead, students acquire a lot of the basic content knowledge outside of class and then classes are built around simple assessments of that basic knowledge (to make sure students are really prepared), followed by application exercises. Since this is a course where the students are supposed to have already acquired much of the basic knowledge previously anyway (i.e., a lower-division stats class is a prerequisite), and the point is for students to get experience using that knowledge in the ways that economists do, I think the TBL structure actually is a good fit. Instead of me talking, students will spend almost all of the class time doing. Plus, the teams will mean I can give more complex assignments without a corresponding increase in time spent grading (one section will have 70 students and the other will have 60 - yes, I know that's totally nuts). I've still got a ton of things to figure out, and I have serious concerns about how this is going to go over with the students, but as I have been thinking about the types of activities I want students to do and how these will work in groups, I have to say that I'm pretty excited!

* I blame Bill Goffe for this - he mentioned TBL to me in an email a few months ago and then recently posted this link on the tch-econ listserv, showing TBL in action in a large lecture. If you're not familiar with the technique, I highly recommend checking out the video and the website.

Comments

  1. How very exciting! I have just discovered Team-Based Learning (TBL) myself in the past year and I think there is something to it.

    I tried using TBL for an intro-level environmental economics and policy course this past year and I liked many aspects of it. Beware, some students think that the professor "isn't teaching" in TBL courses because they are so used to being lectured at, but I think it really creates a great learning environment.

    The assignments seem to be of the highest import: good assignments will require teams to work together as a team and not just let one motivated student do it by herself. This can be a real challenge for a class like your data analysis course, as we are used to doing data analysis alone and not necessarily in teams of five.

    One of my favorite parts of TBL is that the assignments tend to ask teams to simultaneously report their specific answers to the same question. Teams cannot hide behind whatever answers are already offered, as everyone has to answer at the same time. Class discussion naturally follows when teams have different answers.

    I want to try teaching my Principles of Micro course this fall using TBL. I look forward to following along with your TBL adventures!

    ReplyDelete
  2. TBL is a great approach and it sounds like it's particularly appropriate for this course. It also works well with clickers--one per student for individual quizzes, one per team for group quizzes!

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Aaron: Thanks for the encouragement! I do think that my principles students would be incredibly resistant to TBL (though that video about the large class gives me hope). With the upper-division class, I'm a little less worried because I think it will be easier to convince students that this is not a course where I should be talking at them anyway - they need to DO stuff. If it goes well, I may try TBL with Principles at some point so let me know how your class goes!
    @Derek: Yes, definitely going to use clickers! Since the TBL approach really emphasizes that in the application exercises, students should make a *specific* choice, I'm thinking that in addition the quizzes, it will be cool to use clickers to have students register their own opinion about the 'right' choice before beginning discussion with their groups. Should be interesting to see how those opinions change specifically after the group discussions!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Comments that contribute to the discussion are always welcome! Please note that spammy comments whose only purpose seems to be to direct traffic to a commercial site will be deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

When is an exam "too hard"?

By now, you may have heard about the biology professor at Louisiana State (Baton Rouge) who was removed from teaching an intro course where "more than 90 percent of the students... were failing or had dropped the class." The majority of the comments on the Inside Higher Ed story about it are supportive of the professor, particularly given that it seems like the administration did not even talk to her about the situation before acting. I tend to fall in the "there's got to be more to the story so I'll reserve judgment" camp but the story definitely struck a nerve with me, partly because I recently spent 30 minutes "debating" with a student about whether the last midterm was "too hard" and the whole conversation was super-frustrating. To give some background: I give three midterms and a cumulative final, plus have clicker points and Aplia assignments that make up about 20% of the final grade. I do not curve individual exams but will cu...

THE podcast on Implicit Bias

I keep telling myself I need to get back to blogging but, well, it's been a long pandemic... But I guess this is as good an excuse as any to post something: I am Bonni Stachowiak's guest on the latest episode of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast, talking about implicit bias and how it can impact our teaching.  Doing the interview with Bonni (which was actually recorded a couple months ago) was a lot of fun. Listening to it now, I also realize how far I have come from the instructor I was when I started this blog over a decade ago. I've been away from the blog so long that I should probably spell this out: my current title is Associate Vice President for Faculty and Staff Diversity and I have responsibility for all professional learning and development related to diversity, equity and inclusion, as well as inclusive faculty and staff recruitment, and unit-level diversity planning. But I often say that in a lot of ways, I have no business being in this position - I've ne...

Designing effective courses means thinking through the WHAT and the HOW (in that order)

I think most folks have heard by now that the California State University system (in which I work) has announced the intention to prepare for fall classes to be primarily online. I have to say, I am sort of confused why everyone is making such a big deal about this - no matter what your own institution is saying, no instructor who cares about their own mental health (let alone their students) should be thinking we are going back to 'business as usual' in the fall. In my mind, the only sane thing to do is at least prepare  for the possibility of still teaching remotely. Fortunately, unlike this spring, we now have a lot more time for that preparation. Faculty developers across the country have been working overtime since March, and they aren't slowing down now; we are all trying to make sure we can offer our faculty the training and resources they will need to redesign fall courses for online or hybrid modalities. But one big difference between the training faculty needed ...