Skip to main content

Team-based learning: The basics

[If you haven't completed the blog reader survey yet, please take a few minutes to do so (before July 31 if you want to be included in the drawing for a free copy of The Intl Handlbook on Teaching and Learning Economics). Thank you!]

Although I know I've mentioned the fact that I use Team-Based Learning (TBL) in my data analysis class, I can't believe I haven't written a series of posts yet to really explain what I'm doing and how it's working. So here we go... Keep in mind that the class is called Collection and Use of Data in Economics (if anyone's interested, you can get the syllabus here); it is an upper-division required course for all econ majors and they must have already taken Principles (both 101 and 102), lower-division statistics, and an Information Systems course that covers Excel and databases.

For those who know nothing about TBL, the basic idea is that students spend the majority of class time working in permanent teams (i.e., they keep the same team for the whole semester) on exercises that emphasize application, evaluation and other higher-order skills. One thing that differentiates TBL from other problem- or group-based approaches is that it is a "whole course" pedagogy - to get the full benefits of TBL, you really need to design the entire course, from day one, according to a particular structure. I thought the easiest way to explain that structure is to share the explanation that I put in my syllabus:

[After typical intro stuff about requirements, texts, etc.:]
We will be using a learning strategy known as ‘team-based learning’ (TBL); the majority of the work in this class will be done in teams that will be established at the beginning of the semester.

How does TBL work? You will spend most of your time working in teams, applying what you’ve learned from outside readings (and your own review of statistics). The course is divided into several units where each unit lasts a few weeks and follows the same structure:
1. Students read the assigned material for the unit. This will generally be readings in the Greenlaw and Klass books. There will be reading guides provided that are a series of questions that you should be able to answer by the time you come to class.
2. At the beginning of each unit, students will take an “individual Readiness Assessment” (iRA) in class to be sure that they have sufficient knowledge to work problems from this unit. Questions will primarily be over definitions or will be simple applications of facts and definitions. These will be multiple-choice (you will need scantron forms) and will be graded.
3. Immediately following the iRA, students will answer the same questions as a team, with a “team Readiness Assessment” (tRA). This too will be graded. All team members receive the team score.
4. Disputes over missed questions on the tRA can be appealed to the instructor. The appeal must come from the team, it must be written, and it must come no later than the beginning of the next class (detailed instructions for appeals will be distributed later and are posted on Blackboard). All affected students on the team will have their scores changed.
5. The instructor will address common errors on the RA to the class as a whole.
6. Over the following classes, teams solve real-world problems and answer questions that economists must answer as they do their work. Team Applications generally pose a question and ask each team to make a decision. Your team will need to poll each member, listen to each member’s ideas and their explanation of why their idea is the best, and then reach a team consensus. At the end of your deliberation, all of the teams will simultaneously report decisions. Then we’ll discuss the question as a class. Any member of your team may be called upon to explain your team’s response and points may be awarded to the team based on these responses. Several of the Applications also have an individual component that must be completed prior to coming to class. These assignments will involve reading chapters in the Maier book, or articles by other economists, and answering some questions, and/or getting data and doing something with it. That information will then be used to have deeper discussions and make better decisions with your team. In general, you can expect to have something ‘due’ almost every class.
7. At the end of the semester, students complete a confidential evaluation of their teammates, based on their participation in team activities (Did they come to class regularly? Were they prepared for the day’s activity? Did they contribute productively to the team? Respect others’ ideas?). There is a copy of the Peer Evaluation form on Blackboard; note that you will have to distinguish between your teammates. The peer evaluations will be used to weight the Team portion of your grade.
[end of syllabus text]

In the next few posts, I will explain exactly what I do in more detail and some 'best practices', as well as student response. If you have specific questions about TBL, feel free to leave them here and I'll try to answer them as best I can in future posts.

Comments

  1. Let me add my enthusiasm for TBL. Other than for large classes (I'm not sure that it scales to hundreds), I wouldn't use anything else.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Bill! I should have mentioned that my classes are 75 students. Maybe someday, when I really feel like I need a new challenge, I'll try to adapt the 500-seat Principles class to TBL, but I'm skeptical too...

      Delete
  2. I passed this link on to my (former--I have retired) colleagues at Indiana University Northwest, to my friends who are members of Indiana University's Faculty Colloquium on Excellence in Teaching (https://facet.indiana.edu/) and the tch-econ list. Hope you get some visitors frm that.
    Don Coffin

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Don! And thanks for always being so supportive of the blog!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Comments that contribute to the discussion are always welcome! Please note that spammy comments whose only purpose seems to be to direct traffic to a commercial site will be deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

When is an exam "too hard"?

By now, you may have heard about the biology professor at Louisiana State (Baton Rouge) who was removed from teaching an intro course where "more than 90 percent of the students... were failing or had dropped the class." The majority of the comments on the Inside Higher Ed story about it are supportive of the professor, particularly given that it seems like the administration did not even talk to her about the situation before acting. I tend to fall in the "there's got to be more to the story so I'll reserve judgment" camp but the story definitely struck a nerve with me, partly because I recently spent 30 minutes "debating" with a student about whether the last midterm was "too hard" and the whole conversation was super-frustrating. To give some background: I give three midterms and a cumulative final, plus have clicker points and Aplia assignments that make up about 20% of the final grade. I do not curve individual exams but will cu...

THE podcast on Implicit Bias

I keep telling myself I need to get back to blogging but, well, it's been a long pandemic... But I guess this is as good an excuse as any to post something: I am Bonni Stachowiak's guest on the latest episode of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast, talking about implicit bias and how it can impact our teaching.  Doing the interview with Bonni (which was actually recorded a couple months ago) was a lot of fun. Listening to it now, I also realize how far I have come from the instructor I was when I started this blog over a decade ago. I've been away from the blog so long that I should probably spell this out: my current title is Associate Vice President for Faculty and Staff Diversity and I have responsibility for all professional learning and development related to diversity, equity and inclusion, as well as inclusive faculty and staff recruitment, and unit-level diversity planning. But I often say that in a lot of ways, I have no business being in this position - I've ne...

What was your high school economics experience like?

As I mentioned in my last post , I am asking my Econ for Teachers students to reflect on their reading by responding to discussion prompts. It occurred to me that it wouldn't be a bad idea for me to share my thoughts on those issues here and see if anyone wants to chime in. For this week, the students were asked to read the California and national content standards , an article by Mark Schug and others about why social science teachers dread teaching economics and how to overcome the dread, an article by William Walstad on the importance of economics for understanding the world around us and making better personal decisions (with some evidence on the dismal state of economic literacy in this country), and another article by Walstad on the status of economic education in high schools (full citations below). The reflection prompt asks the students to then answer the following questions: What was your high school econ experience like? What do you remember most from that class? How do...