Skip to main content

Gas prices are getting boring

Is it just me or is anyone else getting bored with all the talk about gas prices, especially in the econ blogosphere? I mean, I'm not any happier than the next person about paying over $4.50 a gallon but I guess I just don't care anymore about why gas prices are so high (and seeing a bunch of different blog posts about whether it's due to speculation, all linking to the same debate going on between two other bloggers is just not interesting). I just want to know when other markets are going to catch up and provide good alternatives!

I hope to get back to posting more regularly soon...


Comments

  1. AnonymousJuly 1, 2008 at 3:34 PM

    While I realize I am commenting on the very topic you seem to be slightly less than enthusiastic about, do you think the rapid increase in the price of oil has really accelerated the likelihood of seeing alternative fuel sources in the near future, or left it relatively at the same pace? I have heard many people in the oil business say that gasoline will probably never go back under the $3.50 mark.

    I also have a few more question as well; wouldn't it be smart for the government to increase the gas tax if the price in the world market ever fell significantly?, and two, will we start to see fairs of trains and similar transportation sky rocket to keep the level of passengers stable, therefore making practically the 2 most viable forms of transportation too expensive for the majority of Americans?

    I guess this leads me to my big question; should the government take over all oil companies or other major transportation markets? Whats your take on that question? I realize I asked many questions, but if you can only answer one, I would like to hear your opinions on that last one.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jennifer ImazekiJuly 4, 2008 at 8:34 AM

    Matt: Keep in mind that I know almost nothing about transportation markets so what I'm about to say is simply based on my own impressions and could possibly be based on completely wrong assumptions. There's a whole sub-field of economics that is concerned with these issues though and I'd certainly encourage you to ask others your questions.

    That said: I have no doubt that high gas prices are increasing the demand for alternative fuels, but I don't expect prices for trains and buses to 'skyrocket', partly because I think that, at least in California, people are more likely to turn to other types of transportation (like biking, carpooling, hybrids, etc.) for local transportation than to suddenly switch to public transportation in mass quantities. That might be less true elsewhere but California simply doesn't have the public transportation infrastructure - it's not like the east coast where, for example, it can actually be faster to take the train or subway to get around than to drive. Don't forget that trains and buses are already PUBLIC transportation and, especially in California, I think private industry will come up with good alternatives long before the government gets their act together enough to invest in better transportation infrastructure. If you're talking about larger scale transportation, like airlines, I think that yes, prices are going to rise (they already are for airlines) but they aren't going to 'sky rocket' because demand in those markets is more elastic (for example, more and more people are staying close to home for vacations instead of flying).

    I don't really know much about the oil industry but I'm not aware of any good reason for the government to take over oil companies. Given that the price of oil is determined by the world market and not domestic production, I can't imagine it would do much to the price. I think some believe the oil companies are raking in huge profits so if the government took over, those profits would be returned to consumers through lower prices but I don't buy it - it just is not in the long-term interest of oil companies to let prices get so high, for so long, that people start looking for permanent alternatives that could eventually eliminate our need for oil at all. I assume that by 'major transportation markets' you mean the airlines because local train and bus transportation is already public (Amtrak is sort of a hybrid - it's government owned but privately run, I think). I think an argument could be made for re-regulating the airlines, or drastically changing the way they are handled now. It certainly doesn't make any sense to me that the government keeps bailing out some of the big airlines without at least talking about re-regulating.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Comments that contribute to the discussion are always welcome! Please note that spammy comments whose only purpose seems to be to direct traffic to a commercial site will be deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

THE podcast on Implicit Bias

I keep telling myself I need to get back to blogging but, well, it's been a long pandemic... But I guess this is as good an excuse as any to post something: I am Bonni Stachowiak's guest on the latest episode of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast, talking about implicit bias and how it can impact our teaching.  Doing the interview with Bonni (which was actually recorded a couple months ago) was a lot of fun. Listening to it now, I also realize how far I have come from the instructor I was when I started this blog over a decade ago. I've been away from the blog so long that I should probably spell this out: my current title is Associate Vice President for Faculty and Staff Diversity and I have responsibility for all professional learning and development related to diversity, equity and inclusion, as well as inclusive faculty and staff recruitment, and unit-level diversity planning. But I often say that in a lot of ways, I have no business being in this position - I've ne...
Post a Comment
Read more

When is an exam "too hard"?

By now, you may have heard about the biology professor at Louisiana State (Baton Rouge) who was removed from teaching an intro course where "more than 90 percent of the students... were failing or had dropped the class." The majority of the comments on the Inside Higher Ed story about it are supportive of the professor, particularly given that it seems like the administration did not even talk to her about the situation before acting. I tend to fall in the "there's got to be more to the story so I'll reserve judgment" camp but the story definitely struck a nerve with me, partly because I recently spent 30 minutes "debating" with a student about whether the last midterm was "too hard" and the whole conversation was super-frustrating. To give some background: I give three midterms and a cumulative final, plus have clicker points and Aplia assignments that make up about 20% of the final grade. I do not curve individual exams but will cu...
3 comments
Read more

This is about getting through, not re-inventing your course

As someone who has worked hard to build a lot of interactivity into my courses, I have never been interested in teaching fully online courses, in part because I have felt that the level of engaged interaction could never match that of a face-to-face class (not that there aren't some exceptional online courses out there; I just have a strong preference for the in-person connection). But the current situation is not really about building online courses that are 'just as good' as our face-to-face courses; it is about getting through this particular moment without compromising our students' learning too much. So if you are used to a lot of interaction in your F2F class, here are some options for adapting that interaction for a virtual environment: [NOTE: SDSU is a Zoom/mostly Blackboard campus so that's how I've written this but I am pretty sure that other systems have similar functionality] If you use clickers in class to break up what is otherwise mostly lect...
2 comments
Read more