Skip to main content

Another 'duh' moment

One problem I've always had with doing peer instruction using the CPS software from eInstruction is that you can either set it so that the answer distribution shows up immediately on the slide after the clicker question is closed, or not, and that applies for the entire session. There is no easy way for the instructor to see what the answer distribution is without also showing that distribution to the class. This means that if the answer distribution is mixed and I want to do peer instruction, students will also have seen the answer distribution and that can create issues with students assuming that whatever answer got the highest number of responses must be correct.

At a recent workshop, I mentioned this issue and Mike Salemi suggested that I blank or freeze the projector before the answer distribution shows up; that way, I can see the distribution on the monitor at the podium but the students won't see it. I have no idea why that never occurred to me before but all I could think of was, "Duh! Of course!"
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousJanuary 10, 2010 at 5:01 PM

    You can also us eInstruction's hand-held Mobi tablet. It will show you privately how everyone responded as a group and individual names as well!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jennifer ImazekiJanuary 14, 2010 at 10:18 AM

    Thanks for the suggestion! It looks like the Mobi tablet may not work with the software I use (PPT plug-in) but if it does, this could be a great option!

    ReplyDelete
  3. DerekJanuary 18, 2010 at 11:00 AM

    In the classrooms I usually use, I plug my laptop in to run my clicker questions. When I want to see the results of a clicker question without letting the students see it, I switch the projector from "laptop" to "PC" and show the students whatever is on the PC that comes with the room.

    Since the "blank" button on the projectors we use around here doesn't work like I always think it should, this has been my workaround. I'll sometimes pull up a funny picture to display on the PC while the students are looking at it, too!

    ReplyDelete
  4. UnknownFebruary 8, 2010 at 9:07 AM

    The "freeze" and "pic mute" buttons are definitely underutilized tools on our smart classroom control systems ...

    I've always thought of the peer instruction process as including the sharing of the response distribution after the first asking of the question, I guess mainly to help the group see how the distribution changes from the first to second ask of the question, and thus to perhaps increase some of the metacognition around the process. A good peer instruction question would typically have a fairly even split between the correct response and the most popular distractor. But I can see your concern about how that information might negatively affect the follow-on discussion if that first distribution was well off from the expected.

    I wonder if any of the peer instruction studies have compared results of the process when the answer distribution to the first question is revealed vs. not, and when the first answer distribution is heavily weighted toward a particular response (correct or not), or not.

    ReplyDelete
  5. DerekFebruary 8, 2010 at 11:35 AM

    @Jim, I would love to see some studies of the sort you describe. I'm not aware of any, and I've been tracking clickers research over on my blog.

    I seem to recall that Eric Mazur's group at Harvard was looking into this show / not-show issue, but it's been a year since I asked him about that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Comments that contribute to the discussion are always welcome! Please note that spammy comments whose only purpose seems to be to direct traffic to a commercial site will be deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

When is an exam "too hard"?

By now, you may have heard about the biology professor at Louisiana State (Baton Rouge) who was removed from teaching an intro course where "more than 90 percent of the students... were failing or had dropped the class." The majority of the comments on the Inside Higher Ed story about it are supportive of the professor, particularly given that it seems like the administration did not even talk to her about the situation before acting. I tend to fall in the "there's got to be more to the story so I'll reserve judgment" camp but the story definitely struck a nerve with me, partly because I recently spent 30 minutes "debating" with a student about whether the last midterm was "too hard" and the whole conversation was super-frustrating. To give some background: I give three midterms and a cumulative final, plus have clicker points and Aplia assignments that make up about 20% of the final grade. I do not curve individual exams but will cu...
3 comments
Read more

THE podcast on Implicit Bias

I keep telling myself I need to get back to blogging but, well, it's been a long pandemic... But I guess this is as good an excuse as any to post something: I am Bonni Stachowiak's guest on the latest episode of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast, talking about implicit bias and how it can impact our teaching.  Doing the interview with Bonni (which was actually recorded a couple months ago) was a lot of fun. Listening to it now, I also realize how far I have come from the instructor I was when I started this blog over a decade ago. I've been away from the blog so long that I should probably spell this out: my current title is Associate Vice President for Faculty and Staff Diversity and I have responsibility for all professional learning and development related to diversity, equity and inclusion, as well as inclusive faculty and staff recruitment, and unit-level diversity planning. But I often say that in a lot of ways, I have no business being in this position - I've ne...
Post a Comment
Read more

Designing effective courses means thinking through the WHAT and the HOW (in that order)

I think most folks have heard by now that the California State University system (in which I work) has announced the intention to prepare for fall classes to be primarily online. I have to say, I am sort of confused why everyone is making such a big deal about this - no matter what your own institution is saying, no instructor who cares about their own mental health (let alone their students) should be thinking we are going back to 'business as usual' in the fall. In my mind, the only sane thing to do is at least prepare  for the possibility of still teaching remotely. Fortunately, unlike this spring, we now have a lot more time for that preparation. Faculty developers across the country have been working overtime since March, and they aren't slowing down now; we are all trying to make sure we can offer our faculty the training and resources they will need to redesign fall courses for online or hybrid modalities. But one big difference between the training faculty needed ...
Post a Comment
Read more