Skip to main content

Data class, so far

Geez, where the heck is the summer going? I can't believe it's August already! I had planned to have the data course completely prepped by now so that I could spend August working on other things but of course, things never turn out as planned. Thanks to several trips in July, I'm not nearly as prepped as I'd like but I thought I'd share something about what where I'm at. As I mentioned earlier in the summer, this course is not a typical statistics course - it really is a data analysis course. And I'll be teaching it using team-based learning. The TBL website and listserv have been incredibly helpful with that part.

When I say that this is more of a data analysis course, I mean that we will talk about things like choosing what to count (e.g., if you want to know how income is distributed across households, how do you define 'income'? Once you settle on a variable, do you look at mean, median, different percentiles?) and how to measure those variables (e.g. the Current Population Survey is a household survey so what issues might arise when people self-report income? how do we compare income across geographic areas and time?). Then we'll do a whole section just on reporting data (choosing what type of graphic is most appropriate for your analysis, why the scale of the axes matter, how to read/create tables, etc), and finally, discuss the type of comparative analysis that economists do (e.g., correlation vs. causation, confounding variables). Along the way, they will have to go get data and do stuff with it (calculate descriptive stats, simple regressions) but that is all stuff that technically, they should already know how to do so I'm not going to take any class time to talk about those concepts (though I'll spend a little time talking about how to compute them in Excel).

That last part is tricky - I'm going to be strict about enforcing the prerequisites but just because students have taken a stats class already, that doesn't mean they actually learned (or have retained) much. They certainly need the basic stats concepts in order to talk intelligently about the data, but although they should already have seen those basic concepts, my understanding is that I shouldn't expect them to really have retained much. On the one hand, I don't want to spend too much time on stuff that they should already know; on the other hand, we really can't do much with the data if they don't really know the basic stats concepts. Right now, I'm planning to give students a knowledge survey at the beginning of the semester that will include all the statistics concepts that I will expect them to have at least a basic understanding of; I will tell them that they should use that to gauge how much extra review they will need to do. Then, for each of the modules (I've divided the course into five, maybe six, main topics), I will give them a reading guide that will include the specific stats concepts that they will need to review. Even though they don't have a stats textbook for this class, I'm going to provide some online sources and put a few stats texts on reserve at the library so they have the resources if they need them (if I have time in the future, I may develop some notes of my own but I am pretty sure that's not happening this summer). In general, the students need to have a conceptual understanding of the statistics, more than the technical ability - they need to know what a 95% confidence interval REPRESENTS but I'm less concerned with whether they can CALCULATE it.

In TBL, each module begins with a Readiness Assurance Test which is based on the readings and, in this case, the students' own review of the stats concepts. Then we'll spend class time doing application problems. I'll still in the process of writing all those questions, plus fully fleshing out the individual assignments that students will do on their own outside of class. But it's all definitely coming along...

Comments

  1. Will you share your knowledge survey? We've been having something of a discussion about what we expect (or should expect) our undergrad business majors to know about stats when they graduate, and using something like this to assess what they actually know would be useful. At least I think it would, although my colleagues may not agree.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Comments that contribute to the discussion are always welcome! Please note that spammy comments whose only purpose seems to be to direct traffic to a commercial site will be deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

This is about getting through, not re-inventing your course

As someone who has worked hard to build a lot of interactivity into my courses, I have never been interested in teaching fully online courses, in part because I have felt that the level of engaged interaction could never match that of a face-to-face class (not that there aren't some exceptional online courses out there; I just have a strong preference for the in-person connection). But the current situation is not really about building online courses that are 'just as good' as our face-to-face courses; it is about getting through this particular moment without compromising our students' learning too much. So if you are used to a lot of interaction in your F2F class, here are some options for adapting that interaction for a virtual environment: [NOTE: SDSU is a Zoom/mostly Blackboard campus so that's how I've written this but I am pretty sure that other systems have similar functionality] If you use clickers in class to break up what is otherwise mostly lect...

Designing effective courses means thinking through the WHAT and the HOW (in that order)

I think most folks have heard by now that the California State University system (in which I work) has announced the intention to prepare for fall classes to be primarily online. I have to say, I am sort of confused why everyone is making such a big deal about this - no matter what your own institution is saying, no instructor who cares about their own mental health (let alone their students) should be thinking we are going back to 'business as usual' in the fall. In my mind, the only sane thing to do is at least prepare  for the possibility of still teaching remotely. Fortunately, unlike this spring, we now have a lot more time for that preparation. Faculty developers across the country have been working overtime since March, and they aren't slowing down now; we are all trying to make sure we can offer our faculty the training and resources they will need to redesign fall courses for online or hybrid modalities. But one big difference between the training faculty needed ...

THE podcast on Implicit Bias

I keep telling myself I need to get back to blogging but, well, it's been a long pandemic... But I guess this is as good an excuse as any to post something: I am Bonni Stachowiak's guest on the latest episode of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast, talking about implicit bias and how it can impact our teaching.  Doing the interview with Bonni (which was actually recorded a couple months ago) was a lot of fun. Listening to it now, I also realize how far I have come from the instructor I was when I started this blog over a decade ago. I've been away from the blog so long that I should probably spell this out: my current title is Associate Vice President for Faculty and Staff Diversity and I have responsibility for all professional learning and development related to diversity, equity and inclusion, as well as inclusive faculty and staff recruitment, and unit-level diversity planning. But I often say that in a lot of ways, I have no business being in this position - I've ne...