Skip to main content

When does feedback become 'pre-grading'?

I'm at that point in the semester/assignment cycle where I'm getting a lot of emails from students who are working on their final papers. Some will ask me in class if they can send me a draft to look over. What I generally tell them is that while I won't "pre-grade" their papers, I will certainly let them know if they are (or aren't) on the right track. This is particularly an issue with a couple of assignments where students have a tendency to mis-understand what I am asking them to do. For example, in my writing class, I ask students to write a short (400 word) proposal for a policy brief - they are not supposed to write the brief itself (which was the focus of a previous assignment where they were assigned topics), nor try to make an argument for or against a policy, but they should think about what policy topic they would want to investigate and write a proposal to convince me that such an investigation is needed. No matter how I explain it (and I have now tried many different ways), there are always a number of students who do not understand that they are proposing a larger analysis and they instead try to summarize the policy debate into the two-page maximum, or they write an opinion piece about why a particular policy is needed.  So after they turn in their rough drafts, I usually email those students and explain they are not quite on track. The problem is that many of those students end up sending me additional drafts, as they try to fix things. And at some point, once they ARE on the right track, I have to figure out what to tell them. Do I focus just on the fact that they are finally understanding what I want them to do and tell them "Yes, this looks better", even if their actual execution of the assignment leaves much to be desired? I worry that if I do that, they will think I mean that their paper is now fine and they have no more work to do. Or do I give them feedback on the other aspects of the paper that they still need to fix? The problem I have with that is that is feedback that none of their peers are getting and that I would not have given them if this last draft were the first draft I had seen from them (i.e., if they had been 'on the right track' from the beginning) so that seems to be move more into what I see as "pre-grading" and it doesn't seem fair. On the other hand, isn't my job to help them write the best paper that they can?

This sort of thing is why I am counting down the hours until the semester is over...

Comments

  1. You're right about the fairness issue, I think. The more you help, the more you provide incentives for people to keep sending you drafts, while others are quietly working. I think you have to restrict what you're willing to look at, maybe allow for a verbal question to clarify the assignment. At some point, they've got to follow directions and do it without any further feedback.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting. This is not an issue I face much in teaching high school, as very few students have the wherewithal to complete assignments ahead of time and ask for feedback.

    However, high school students are also much more likely to misinterpret directions, so most high school teachers learn early on to be extremely pro-active about giving directions. We give examples of successful work from previous years and we have students spend time reading and discussing the directions and rubric in class rather than trusting that they will read and understand them on their own. Saying stuff like, "Circle the three most important directions on this assignment description and then compare what you circled with your partner" has dramatically decreased the number of misinterpretations of assignments I've given. Of course we want college students to be able to do that on their own...but...

    On the other hand, our goal as teachers should be to help students learn and improve. If we can do this by giving additional feedback on work before it is turned in, then often we can do the student a service.

    Personally, I think I'd draw the line at responding verbally versus via email. Someone who takes the time to come talk to me (and they occasionally do) has shown some initiative. Someone who shoots me an email in the middle of the night is just being lazy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. One approach is to have a policy that you will give specific feedback in response to a specific question but will not give comprehensive feedback (e.g. when students say "read this and tell me what else I have to do to get an A). This approach works well for homework, though I haven't tried it with papers/essays. This approach works best when you announce it up front and put it in the written instructions for the assignment and/or syllabus.

    Another approach, if your school has a writing center for students, is to refer students there for non-content questions, which greatly cuts down on requests for pre-grading. What I usually do is to require students to make and keep an appointment with an individual writing counselor at the writing center 1 week before the paper's due date; they are instructed to have a draft of their paper to discuss with the counselor. At my school, the writing counselors will, at the student's request, send me a brief summary of the session - the time/date of the appointment, the nature of what they worked on. I tell students to have the counselor send me this report, that it is required to get a grade. This have several benefits. First, the quality of the writing is higher in the average assignment. Second, it forces them to have a draft 1 week before the deadline, when otherwise some of them would write the first draft just before the deadline and turn it in with minimal to no revision. Third, for many students, this is their introduction to the writing center, and some of them realize this is a useful resource they can take advantage of for other courses.

    And finally, it reduces requests for me to pre-grade their papers.

    I like commenter Sarah's suggestion of drawing the line at email. It takes no effort for a student to email you a paper and ask what they must do to it to get an A. But it takes some initiative for them to bring a printed draft to your office hours, have you look it over, and discuss the paper together.

    Besides, this, after all, is what office hours are for. The evenings - when you would likely read the emailed paper and respond - should be your personal time.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Comments that contribute to the discussion are always welcome! Please note that spammy comments whose only purpose seems to be to direct traffic to a commercial site will be deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

When is an exam "too hard"?

By now, you may have heard about the biology professor at Louisiana State (Baton Rouge) who was removed from teaching an intro course where "more than 90 percent of the students... were failing or had dropped the class." The majority of the comments on the Inside Higher Ed story about it are supportive of the professor, particularly given that it seems like the administration did not even talk to her about the situation before acting. I tend to fall in the "there's got to be more to the story so I'll reserve judgment" camp but the story definitely struck a nerve with me, partly because I recently spent 30 minutes "debating" with a student about whether the last midterm was "too hard" and the whole conversation was super-frustrating. To give some background: I give three midterms and a cumulative final, plus have clicker points and Aplia assignments that make up about 20% of the final grade. I do not curve individual exams but will cu...

THE podcast on Implicit Bias

I keep telling myself I need to get back to blogging but, well, it's been a long pandemic... But I guess this is as good an excuse as any to post something: I am Bonni Stachowiak's guest on the latest episode of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast, talking about implicit bias and how it can impact our teaching.  Doing the interview with Bonni (which was actually recorded a couple months ago) was a lot of fun. Listening to it now, I also realize how far I have come from the instructor I was when I started this blog over a decade ago. I've been away from the blog so long that I should probably spell this out: my current title is Associate Vice President for Faculty and Staff Diversity and I have responsibility for all professional learning and development related to diversity, equity and inclusion, as well as inclusive faculty and staff recruitment, and unit-level diversity planning. But I often say that in a lot of ways, I have no business being in this position - I've ne...

What was your high school economics experience like?

As I mentioned in my last post , I am asking my Econ for Teachers students to reflect on their reading by responding to discussion prompts. It occurred to me that it wouldn't be a bad idea for me to share my thoughts on those issues here and see if anyone wants to chime in. For this week, the students were asked to read the California and national content standards , an article by Mark Schug and others about why social science teachers dread teaching economics and how to overcome the dread, an article by William Walstad on the importance of economics for understanding the world around us and making better personal decisions (with some evidence on the dismal state of economic literacy in this country), and another article by Walstad on the status of economic education in high schools (full citations below). The reflection prompt asks the students to then answer the following questions: What was your high school econ experience like? What do you remember most from that class? How do...