Skip to main content

More econ vs. personal finance

I loved this title of a recent post at Get Rich Slowly: If Personal Finance is Easy, Why Isn’t Everybody Rich? The post talks about the fact that getting rich is about more than just knowing what to do - it's just as much, if not more, about whether you are emotionally and mentally able to do what you know you need to do:
Human beings are complex creatures. Some of us are highly logical. Some of us are emotional. Most of us fall someplace in between. We rarely make decisions based on optimal paths; more often, we choose what makes us happy in the short term. I’m not saying that this is the right thing to do — it’s just what happens. For those who routinely make financial decisions based on emotion, it can be difficult to turn things around.
This is why I believe it is much more important for high school students to be well-trained in economics, before we start worrying about their knowledge of personal finance. Economics puts human behavior front and center, pointing out over and over that whether you want to admit it or not, life involves trade-offs. I simply don't think that knowing the 'rules' of good personal finance will be much help to someone who doesn't truly understand the more foundational concepts of opportunity costs and cost-benefit analysis.

Related posts:
Economics vs. personal finance
Choice and responsibility: self-help or just good economics?

Comments

  1. I agree that econ is a good basis for an education in finance, but I think people can learn the basics without having to understand economics. Really you just have to teach them to invest for the longterm, the problems with collecting debt and various products that people can invest in. I think that's probably all most people need.

    ReplyDelete
  2. My concern isn't so much that people can't understand the basics of finance without economics - I absolutely agree that they can. But there are a lot of people who presumably 'know' what to do but don't actually do it (at least, that was the point of the post on Get Rich Slowly) and I think economics is more about training people to make better choices. My original post was also more about whether financial education should replace economics education in school curriculum - given those two options, I think econ is more useful since it is the foundation for finance plus a lot more.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "People know what to do and don't do it"
    We can say the same thing about learning or knowing anything, couldn't we? I mean information abounds about the consequences of not exercising, smoking, eating too much bacon and ice cream. We observe people who appear to make smart decisions in some arenas but don't make them in others. Psychologists likely have answers, religion does too, maybe even sociology. It's one of those human condition things that makes education such a messy endeavor.

    I wouldn't reduce it to "motivation" either, there are just too many ways to slice that concept and it can't account for a lot of examples.


    One way to think about it, is to think about metacognition (thinking about thinking) or in this case, thinking about learning. If you'd agree that we do most of our learning throughout life outside of classrooms and experientially, then it's an interesting thought experiment.
    There's something in helping students think about learning,when they've learned something and what they did, what facilitated that


    I heard this pearl of wisdom from a classmate, a 21 year old man (I'm 48) who's also very bright. We were talking about being efficient as a student and why we thought it was an important skill to have. He said, he's basically lazy, and doesn't want to spend any more time on anything than he has to. It completely resonated with me and I've taken that explanation on too.

    Two things about this story I'd like to share. First, he clearly thinks about thinking already at 21. It might be his personality type, or learning style (Gardner's intrapersonal). Second, I learned instantaneously from that exchange. It's a bit of knowledge, even wisdom, I immediately recognized as wanting. It's a piece of knowledge I know I'll share too.

    At the macro level, the issue might go something like this: We don't live in a culture that values education, really. We argue constantly about what it's purpose is.

    Also, there's an ongoing tension between Jacksonian and Jeffersonian ideals of democracy and education. The former underpins the idea that everyone should be educated. The latter sets the individual at the center, allowing for an elite class.
    If you believe that learning involves adopting identities, ways of thinking and believing then not learning can also be seen as resistance, rebellion and cultural pride. Class, race and gender have a lot to do with the decisions and desires to learn.

    This is a classic:
    Learning to Labour: how working class kids get working class jobs - Paul Willis (1977

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Comments that contribute to the discussion are always welcome! Please note that spammy comments whose only purpose seems to be to direct traffic to a commercial site will be deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

This is about getting through, not re-inventing your course

As someone who has worked hard to build a lot of interactivity into my courses, I have never been interested in teaching fully online courses, in part because I have felt that the level of engaged interaction could never match that of a face-to-face class (not that there aren't some exceptional online courses out there; I just have a strong preference for the in-person connection). But the current situation is not really about building online courses that are 'just as good' as our face-to-face courses; it is about getting through this particular moment without compromising our students' learning too much. So if you are used to a lot of interaction in your F2F class, here are some options for adapting that interaction for a virtual environment: [NOTE: SDSU is a Zoom/mostly Blackboard campus so that's how I've written this but I am pretty sure that other systems have similar functionality] If you use clickers in class to break up what is otherwise mostly lect...

Designing effective courses means thinking through the WHAT and the HOW (in that order)

I think most folks have heard by now that the California State University system (in which I work) has announced the intention to prepare for fall classes to be primarily online. I have to say, I am sort of confused why everyone is making such a big deal about this - no matter what your own institution is saying, no instructor who cares about their own mental health (let alone their students) should be thinking we are going back to 'business as usual' in the fall. In my mind, the only sane thing to do is at least prepare  for the possibility of still teaching remotely. Fortunately, unlike this spring, we now have a lot more time for that preparation. Faculty developers across the country have been working overtime since March, and they aren't slowing down now; we are all trying to make sure we can offer our faculty the training and resources they will need to redesign fall courses for online or hybrid modalities. But one big difference between the training faculty needed ...

THE podcast on Implicit Bias

I keep telling myself I need to get back to blogging but, well, it's been a long pandemic... But I guess this is as good an excuse as any to post something: I am Bonni Stachowiak's guest on the latest episode of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast, talking about implicit bias and how it can impact our teaching.  Doing the interview with Bonni (which was actually recorded a couple months ago) was a lot of fun. Listening to it now, I also realize how far I have come from the instructor I was when I started this blog over a decade ago. I've been away from the blog so long that I should probably spell this out: my current title is Associate Vice President for Faculty and Staff Diversity and I have responsibility for all professional learning and development related to diversity, equity and inclusion, as well as inclusive faculty and staff recruitment, and unit-level diversity planning. But I often say that in a lot of ways, I have no business being in this position - I've ne...