Skip to main content

How much technology and social media is 'too much'?

As I've been working on bringing more Web 2.0 tools into my classes, I have frequently wondered how much is too much? I know that my students are supposedly 'digital natives' but I also know that they are not all as cutting-edge tech savvy as we old fogies sometimes assume. For my intro Principles class, students have to maneuver Blackboard (including using discussion boards), Aplia (a private third-party website that provides online problems and experiments for econ classes), an online textbook available through Aplia, clickers, PowerPoint slides and podcasts. In addition, I'm very likely going to be participating in a pilot program to capture my lectures so those will be on iTunes U as well (though students will certainly not be required to watch them - they will just be available as an extra resource). I'm also thinking about using Twitter as an option for students to get reminders and to ask questions in class (also not required but just an extra resource) but am really worried it will all be too much. In my upper-division class, there's a lot less for them to worry about for each class meeting but they will have to deal with doing blogs instead.

On the one hand, all of these tools are invaluable for helping me achieve many of my objectives for these courses. There is simply no way I could make the 500-seater as interactive as I'd like without them. But I anticipate a lot of confusion among students in the first few weeks of school, no matter how many FAQs I put together or how clear my instructions are. But perhaps that is simply the price that must be paid. Do you think it's possible to have 'too much' technology in a class?

Comments

  1. Yesno. From a practical perspective that considers cognitive load, yes I think every thing an individual has to think about demands attention. One of the tasks of a teacher is to direct attention.

    From a educational perspective, students' comfort zones with all aspects of the learning endeavor will vary. So in one sense, managing the learning endeavor so it accounts for this might be one way to think about it.

    Why don't you survey your students about the impact of each technology on their learning?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, I think it's possible to put in too much technology, and I'm guilty of this. I love Spanish textbooks that come with an on-line workbook, but my students have largely been frustrated with on-line workbooks.

    I like Suzanne's suggestion to poll students about particular tech. tools. Finding out what works and what doesn't for their learning is crucial.

    Personally, I'm planning to introduce one new tool (apart from the learning management system) each semester to avoid the confusion and to better evaluate each tool's effectiveness toward learning goals. I'm hoping to be explicit not only in my instructions but in making students aware of the reasons for employing a tech. tool in a particular course.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Last fall, I did survey students about different aspects of the course and the vast majority found clickers and Aplia to be useful (based on Likert-scale questions about their usefulness to learning).
    @dispersemos: I agree that adding one new tool at a time is a good way to go but there's still the problem that while only one tool is new to YOU, they are ALL new to your students! Compared to last year, I'm only adding one new technology piece (podcasts), so I'm fairly comfortable with most of the tools but still expect some confusion among my students.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Comments that contribute to the discussion are always welcome! Please note that spammy comments whose only purpose seems to be to direct traffic to a commercial site will be deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

What are the costs?

I came across an interesting discussion about a 19-year-old intern who was fired from The Gazette in Colorado Springs for plagiarism. There appears to be some controversy over the fact that the editor publicly named the girl in a letter to readers (explaining and apologizing for the plagiarism), with some people saying that doing so was unduly harsh because this incident will now follow her for the rest of her career. I was intrigued by this discussion for two reasons - one, it seems pretty clear to me that this was not a case of ignorance (as I have often encountered with my own students who have no idea how to paraphrase or cite correctly) and two, putting aside the offense itself, I have often struggled with how to handle situations where there are long-term repercussions for a student, repercussions that lead the overall costs to be far higher than might seem warranted for the specific situation. As an example of the latter issue, I have occasionally taught seniors who need to p

What was your high school economics experience like?

As I mentioned in my last post , I am asking my Econ for Teachers students to reflect on their reading by responding to discussion prompts. It occurred to me that it wouldn't be a bad idea for me to share my thoughts on those issues here and see if anyone wants to chime in. For this week, the students were asked to read the California and national content standards , an article by Mark Schug and others about why social science teachers dread teaching economics and how to overcome the dread, an article by William Walstad on the importance of economics for understanding the world around us and making better personal decisions (with some evidence on the dismal state of economic literacy in this country), and another article by Walstad on the status of economic education in high schools (full citations below). The reflection prompt asks the students to then answer the following questions: What was your high school econ experience like? What do you remember most from that class? How do

When is an exam "too hard"?

By now, you may have heard about the biology professor at Louisiana State (Baton Rouge) who was removed from teaching an intro course where "more than 90 percent of the students... were failing or had dropped the class." The majority of the comments on the Inside Higher Ed story about it are supportive of the professor, particularly given that it seems like the administration did not even talk to her about the situation before acting. I tend to fall in the "there's got to be more to the story so I'll reserve judgment" camp but the story definitely struck a nerve with me, partly because I recently spent 30 minutes "debating" with a student about whether the last midterm was "too hard" and the whole conversation was super-frustrating. To give some background: I give three midterms and a cumulative final, plus have clicker points and Aplia assignments that make up about 20% of the final grade. I do not curve individual exams but will cu