Skip to main content

Diminishing marginal product

For the last couple semesters, I've dropped the discussion of production costs from my principles class - I've felt like I didn't have time and most students who aren't going to take additional economics classes really don't need to sit through the derivation of all the cost curves. So I just go through an intuitive explanation of why the supply curve is upward-sloping and leave it at that. But this semester, I decided to at least go through the derivation of the supply curve as the marginal cost curve because I think it will help students to make a stronger connection between supply and the firm's costs. Plus, decreasing marginal product/increasing marginal cost is one of the few concepts that I can teach with an in-class demonstration and I've missed doing that.

In my smaller classes, and in the old days of chalkboards, I would have students 'grow rice' on the board. I don't remember where I first saw that activity but students write the word 'RICE' on the board as many times as they can in, say, ten seconds. They have fixed capital (one piece of chalk and a set amount of space on the board) and then you start adding labor. Since they only have one piece of chalk, they have to break up the chalk to share and it gets pretty funny as they try to break it into smaller and smaller pieces. They also start getting in each other's way at the board. Students can get pretty creative about trying to maximize output (e.g., recruiting short and tall people who can reach different areas of the board without bumping each other) but diminishing marginal product always sets in at some point.

With the big classroom, there isn't a chalkboard so I had to figure out something else and I found a game using tennis balls where students 'produce' tennis balls by moving the balls from one bucket to another. It works pretty well and like with the rice activity, it can be quite amusing to see the students try not to run into each other*. There are different variations of how you set up the production process - I tell the students that each student can only carry one ball at a time and they must individually place the ball in the other bucket but an alternative is to let them form a line and pass the balls down (diminishing marginal product sets in partly because they invariably start dropping them). The important thing (which I learned the first time I ran it) is that you have to be very clear with them that they cannot change the technology as they add more workers; as long as that's clear, you should start getting diminishing MP pretty quickly.

One of the cool things about this activity is that is can be done with a class of any size. I've always found that it's just as memorable for students who simply observe as for those who personally participate.

* For anyone who might be wondering, I know that another common activity to show the same concept is to have students fold and/or staple paper in a production line to create widgets or paper airplanes or something like that, but I've always thought that the rice and tennis ball games are more appealing because the students are a lot more physically active and that seems to get the other students more involved (e.g., cheering them on as they run around). Or maybe I'm just slightly sadistic and like to see them running into each other...

Comments

  1. hello I used the tennis ball activity in my class today. I think kids really enjoyed it and so did I. Thank you for posting it!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Comments that contribute to the discussion are always welcome! Please note that spammy comments whose only purpose seems to be to direct traffic to a commercial site will be deleted.

Popular posts from this blog

When is an exam "too hard"?

By now, you may have heard about the biology professor at Louisiana State (Baton Rouge) who was removed from teaching an intro course where "more than 90 percent of the students... were failing or had dropped the class." The majority of the comments on the Inside Higher Ed story about it are supportive of the professor, particularly given that it seems like the administration did not even talk to her about the situation before acting. I tend to fall in the "there's got to be more to the story so I'll reserve judgment" camp but the story definitely struck a nerve with me, partly because I recently spent 30 minutes "debating" with a student about whether the last midterm was "too hard" and the whole conversation was super-frustrating. To give some background: I give three midterms and a cumulative final, plus have clicker points and Aplia assignments that make up about 20% of the final grade. I do not curve individual exams but will cu

What was your high school economics experience like?

As I mentioned in my last post , I am asking my Econ for Teachers students to reflect on their reading by responding to discussion prompts. It occurred to me that it wouldn't be a bad idea for me to share my thoughts on those issues here and see if anyone wants to chime in. For this week, the students were asked to read the California and national content standards , an article by Mark Schug and others about why social science teachers dread teaching economics and how to overcome the dread, an article by William Walstad on the importance of economics for understanding the world around us and making better personal decisions (with some evidence on the dismal state of economic literacy in this country), and another article by Walstad on the status of economic education in high schools (full citations below). The reflection prompt asks the students to then answer the following questions: What was your high school econ experience like? What do you remember most from that class? How do

THE podcast on Implicit Bias

I keep telling myself I need to get back to blogging but, well, it's been a long pandemic... But I guess this is as good an excuse as any to post something: I am Bonni Stachowiak's guest on the latest episode of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast, talking about implicit bias and how it can impact our teaching.  Doing the interview with Bonni (which was actually recorded a couple months ago) was a lot of fun. Listening to it now, I also realize how far I have come from the instructor I was when I started this blog over a decade ago. I've been away from the blog so long that I should probably spell this out: my current title is Associate Vice President for Faculty and Staff Diversity and I have responsibility for all professional learning and development related to diversity, equity and inclusion, as well as inclusive faculty and staff recruitment, and unit-level diversity planning. But I often say that in a lot of ways, I have no business being in this position - I've ne